1.2. Asset Description
This study used a parcel-level inventory of buildings in the Bay Area that was developed by UrbanSim ([Waddell02]) using public resources such as the City and County of San Francisco’s data portal ([DataSF20]) and tax assessor databases.
The raw database which includes 1.8 M San Francisco buildings were shared in the collaboration with UrbanSim. The UrbanSim database includes two files:
Buildings File: a CSV file that contains building properties including total floor area, number of stories, year built, building occupancy and parcel ID.
Parcels File: a CSV file including the latitude and longitude of each building defined by the parcel ID.
A parsing application was built to collect the mentioned building properties and from the UrbanSim building files. The occupancy ID (in integer) was used to infer the occupancy type and replacement cost per unit area (Table 1.2.1). The buildings with missing or invalid occupancy ID, the building was mapped to the default occupancy type (i.e., residential) with average area of buildings in the inventory.
Occupancy ID |
Occupancy Class |
Replacement Cost / SQFT |
Contents Factor |
---|---|---|---|
1/2/3/12 |
Residential |
137.5 |
0.5 |
4/14 |
Office |
131.9 |
1.0 |
5 |
Hotel |
137.3 |
0.5 |
6 |
School |
142.1 |
1.3 |
7 |
Industrial |
97.5 |
1.5 |
8 |
Industrial |
86.0 |
1.5 |
9 |
Industrial |
104.0 |
1.5 |
10/11/13 |
Retail |
105.3 |
1.0 |
Default |
Residential |
137.5 |
0.5 |
The structure types were also mapped from the building occupancy types along with the year built and number of stories. Unless the building was mapped to a single structure type, the structure type is considered random, in which case the mapped structure types are equally likely. Table 1.2.2 summarizes the structure type mapping.
Year Built |
Number of Stories |
Occupancy |
Mapped Structure Types |
---|---|---|---|
Older than 1900 |
Any |
Any |
Wood (W1) and Masonry (RM1, RM2, URM) |
Newer than 1900 |
1~3 |
Residential |
Wood (W1) |
Newer than 1900 |
1~3 |
Comercial |
Wood, Steel, Concrete, Reinforced Masonary (W1, S1, S2, C1, C2, C3, RM1, RM2) |
Newer than 1900 |
1~3 |
Industrial |
Steel, Concrete, and Reinforced Masonary (S1, S2, C1, C2, C3, RM1, RM2) |
Newer than 1900 |
1~3 |
Other |
Wood (W1) |
Newer than 1900 |
4~7 |
Residential and Commercial |
Wood, Steel, Concrete (W1, S1, S2, C1, C2) |
Newer than 1900 |
4~7 |
Industrial |
Steel, Concrete (S1, S2, C1, C2) |
Newer than 1900 |
4~7 |
Other |
Wood, Steel, Concrete (W1, S1, S2, C1, C2) |
Newer than 1900 |
More than 7 |
Any |
Steel and Concrete (S1, S2, C1, C2) |
The available information about location and building geometry were further refined by merging the UrbanSim database with the publicly available Microsoft Building Footprint data ([Microsoft20]) for the testbed area. These data were used to populate two additional attributes, replacement cost and structure type, based on a ruleset that considers local design practice and real estate pricing. For further details about the database and ruleset see [Elhadded19].
- Waddell02
Waddell, P. (2002). UrbanSim: Modeling Urban Development for Land Use, Transportation, and Environmental Planning. J. Am. Planning Assoc. 68, 297–314. doi: 10.1080/01944360208976274
- DataSF20
DataSF (2020). Building and Infrastructure Databases. San Francisco, SF: DataSF.
- Microsoft20
Microsoft (2020). Microsoft Building Footprint Database for the United States. Washington, DC. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/maps/building-footprints.
- Elhadded19
Elhaddad, W., McKenna, F., Rynge, M., Lowe, J. B., Wang, C., and Zsarnoczay, A. (2019). NHERI-SimCenter/WorkflowRegionalEarthquake: rWHALE (Version v1.1.0). http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2554610